Computational Strategies for Binding Hotspot Identification
Computational hotspot identification: alanine scanning, FoldX and MD refine the 3–8 interface residues carrying ΔΔG ≥ 2 kcal/mol into hard design constraints.
Computational hotspot identification: alanine scanning, FoldX and MD refine the 3–8 interface residues carrying ΔΔG ≥ 2 kcal/mol into hard design constraints.
Explore more from this discipline or browse the full archive.
A ligand-conditioned design campaign against perfluorobutanesulfonamide generated 195 binder candidates, with a top docking score of -7.74 kcal/mol and a target QED of 0.806.
Send us a target surface and we will scope a feasibility review, design binders, and report the same objective metrics our research is built on.
A ligand-conditioned binder campaign against GenX (HFPO-DA) generated 170 candidates, with a top docking score of -7.84 kcal/mol and a target QED of 0.806.
A full AffiniBind campaign against perfluorononanoic acid generated 194 binder candidates, with the top design reaching a docking score of -9.50 kcal/mol and a generator confidence of 0.9549.
Not all interface residues contribute equally to binding affinity. A small subset, the binding "hotspots", accounts for the majority of the binding free energy. Identifying these residues is the first step in designing a binder that works.
Alanine scanning mutagenesis, systematically mutating each interface residue to alanine and measuring the change in binding free energy (ΔΔG), is the gold standard for hotspot identification. Computational alanine scanning accelerates this process by orders of magnitude:
ddg_monomer and flex_ddG protocols estimate ΔΔG values by sampling side-chain rotamers and backbone relaxation around each mutation.Static structures miss the dynamic nature of protein interfaces. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations reveal:
Once hotspots are identified, they become design constraints for the binder generation pipeline:
WeaveSeq's hotspot identification pipeline integrates computational alanine scanning, short MD refinement, and consensus scoring to produce a ranked hotspot map for each target. This map feeds directly into the binder generation engine, ensuring that every design targets the energetically most important interface residues.
Explore our open design campaigns to see hotspot analysis applied to real targets. View open targets
Related reading: our binding-site fingerprinting benchmark, geometric complementarity in interface engineering, and the architecture of de novo protein binders.